Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-03 04:24:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The claim that "Stewart" was "One of the central figures at the heart of the LGBTQ+ rights case" is a lie. The record shows that the hoax inquiry played no part in the Court's decision. It is not mentioned in any of the rationale for the decision documented in the ruling. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/600/21-476/

Written by 3BE6E3286B2D3965870F36A1512E8D229734B1217BE516BCE9B8E456142025EC
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1675722067680067584
• noteId - 1675722067680067584
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 3BE6E3286B2D3965870F36A1512E8D229734B1217BE516BCE9B8E456142025EC Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1688358249002
• tweetId - 1675595261844791308
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The claim that "Stewart" was "One of the central figures at the heart of the LGBTQ+ rights case" is a lie. The record shows that the hoax inquiry played no part in the Court's decision. It is not mentioned in any of the rationale for the decision documented in the ruling. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/600/21-476/