Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 19:26:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 077228CC77E5F3408DD196BBBD2C4A6EC646E7FAFA75C4B023A90347463989D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misrepresentation of a complex ruling “States may “protect gay persons, just as [they] can protect other classes of individuals, in acquiring whatever products and services they choose on the same terms and conditions as are offered to other members of the public.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674836714504835072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 077228CC77E5F3408DD196BBBD2C4A6EC646E7FAFA75C4B023A90347463989D3
  • createdAtMillis - 1688153189922
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674836714504835072077228CC77E5F3408DD196BBBD2C4A6EC646E7FAFA75C4B023A90347463989D3