Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-30 17:46:04 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is a misrepresentation of a complex ruling “States may “protect gay persons, just as [they] can protect other classes of individuals, in acquiring whatever products and services they choose on the same terms and conditions as are offered to other members of the public.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

Written by 2293FED422BB89A86FF4CEBCEDCCDE599829083B6542A75269CD92DB760B54BA
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1674836714504835072
• noteId - 1674836714504835072
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 2293FED422BB89A86FF4CEBCEDCCDE599829083B6542A75269CD92DB760B54BA Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1688147164357
• tweetId - 1674783258196983808
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• This is a misrepresentation of a complex ruling “States may “protect gay persons, just as [they] can protect other classes of individuals, in acquiring whatever products and services they choose on the same terms and conditions as are offered to other members of the public.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf