Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 09:24:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Above note is not needed. This post is clearly a satire of the Hooper v. Tulsa case involving a fight over whether authorities have any legal purview over "native" American residents. The case involves a traffic citation, thus the obviously parodical meme. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/22-5034/22-5034-2023-06-28.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674708533231616001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1688117079694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167470853323161600198F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8