Birdwatch Note
2023-06-30 09:16:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Above note is not needed. This post is clearly a satire of the Hooper v. Tulsa case involving a fight over whether authorities have any legal purview over "native" American residents. The case involves a traffic citation, thus the obviously parodical meme. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/22-5034/22-5034-2023-06-28.html
Written by 8CC979DC519E344FD4C77F2FD3D25272117BDBF08FAF178AEC7C5D4FF209DBE6
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674489297649410048
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1674708533231616001
- noteId - 1674708533231616001
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8CC979DC519E344FD4C77F2FD3D25272117BDBF08FAF178AEC7C5D4FF209DBE6 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688116603561
- tweetId - 1674489297649410048
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Above note is not needed. This post is clearly a satire of the Hooper v. Tulsa case involving a fight over whether authorities have any legal purview over "native" American residents. The case involves a traffic citation, thus the obviously parodical meme. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/22-5034/22-5034-2023-06-28.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-30 09:16:43 UTC (1688116603561) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-07-01 02:12:43 UTC (1688177563036) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-30 13:03:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 09:46:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 08:55:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 08:49:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 08:28:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 08:18:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 08:10:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 07:21:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 06:24:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 05:44:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 05:19:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 04:24:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-15 11:10:43 -0500 | Rating Details |