Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 14:46:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0088AB3D6BC518EB2629D62495BE29D8CDBCB0CFFEB164CA7AC4C83EF2922228
Participant Details

Original Note:

Above note is not needed. This post is clearly a satire of the Hooper v. Tulsa case involving a fight over whether authorities have any legal purview over "native" American residents. The case involves a traffic citation, thus the obviously parodical meme. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/22-5034/22-5034-2023-06-28.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674708533231616001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0088AB3D6BC518EB2629D62495BE29D8CDBCB0CFFEB164CA7AC4C83EF2922228
  • createdAtMillis - 1688136390692
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16747085332316160010088AB3D6BC518EB2629D62495BE29D8CDBCB0CFFEB164CA7AC4C83EF2922228