Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-30 02:35:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB6546D93738B169BA6E6B431A03776F72562A11221E3C9943596EAC7125ADF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon. Phylogenetic analysis of full-length genome sequences obtained from infected patients showed that SARS-CoV-2 is similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and not man made. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03899-4#Sec2 https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674500681078566932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB6546D93738B169BA6E6B431A03776F72562A11221E3C9943596EAC7125ADF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1688092545426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1674500681078566932EB6546D93738B169BA6E6B431A03776F72562A11221E3C9943596EAC7125ADF8