Birdwatch Note
2023-06-29 19:30:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no evidence SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon. Phylogenetic analysis of full-length genome sequences obtained from infected patients showed that SARS-CoV-2 is similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and not man made. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03899-4#Sec2 https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119
Written by F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674410942392684544
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1674500681078566932
- noteId - 1674500681078566932
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1688067047745
- tweetId - 1674410942392684544
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no evidence SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon. Phylogenetic analysis of full-length genome sequences obtained from infected patients showed that SARS-CoV-2 is similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and not man made. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-020-03899-4#Sec2 https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2211107119
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-29 19:30:47 UTC (1688067047745) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-30 02:12:57 UTC (1688091177552) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-29 17:21:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 16:41:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 16:06:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 15:53:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 15:05:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 15:03:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 14:48:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 14:41:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 14:40:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 14:38:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 10:36:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 08:46:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 03:49:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 03:37:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 03:26:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-30 02:38:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 21:35:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 20:23:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-29 20:01:01 -0500 | Rating Details |