Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-28 16:58:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9FD6A698349255126258747F0D957C3424D268DBDFAC154B82ADDB122DA1D8A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet claims that the multiple VIC for one voter is evidence of fraud when there is zero proof that this led to someone voting more than once. ID that proves address is required to vote. “NOTE: The Voter Information Card cannot be used as Identification” https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/9710-Acceptable-Identification-2018.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674093431721697280
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9FD6A698349255126258747F0D957C3424D268DBDFAC154B82ADDB122DA1D8A
  • createdAtMillis - 1687971501298
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674093431721697280D9FD6A698349255126258747F0D957C3424D268DBDFAC154B82ADDB122DA1D8A