Birdwatch Note
2023-06-28 16:32:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The tweet claims that the multiple VIC for one voter is evidence of fraud when there is zero proof that this led to someone voting more than once. ID that proves address is required to vote. “NOTE: The Voter Information Card cannot be used as Identification” https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/9710-Acceptable-Identification-2018.pdf
Written by 367BD4DB83A55ECA1419FC2DAAB1A23E62C224359DF53A79B127C8AFF057E5C5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674039297006088192
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1674093431721697280
- noteId - 1674093431721697280
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 367BD4DB83A55ECA1419FC2DAAB1A23E62C224359DF53A79B127C8AFF057E5C5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687969951932
- tweetId - 1674039297006088192
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The tweet claims that the multiple VIC for one voter is evidence of fraud when there is zero proof that this led to someone voting more than once. ID that proves address is required to vote. “NOTE: The Voter Information Card cannot be used as Identification” https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/9710-Acceptable-Identification-2018.pdf
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-28 16:32:31 UTC (1687969951932) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-29 02:10:57 UTC (1688004657067) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-28 14:45:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 13:25:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 13:20:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 12:29:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 12:19:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 11:58:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 11:56:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 11:01:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 09:37:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 09:32:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 09:31:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 09:20:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 08:51:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 08:39:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 08:23:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 08:08:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 07:43:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 07:29:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 07:19:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 05:58:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 05:39:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 04:39:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 04:33:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 04:08:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 03:49:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-29 01:03:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 20:36:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-28 20:31:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-30 11:41:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-03 07:52:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-07-05 09:40:15 -0500 | Rating Details |