Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-28 16:32:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The tweet claims that the multiple VIC for one voter is evidence of fraud when there is zero proof that this led to someone voting more than once. ID that proves address is required to vote. “NOTE: The Voter Information Card cannot be used as Identification” https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/9710-Acceptable-Identification-2018.pdf

Written by 367BD4DB83A55ECA1419FC2DAAB1A23E62C224359DF53A79B127C8AFF057E5C5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1674039297006088192

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1674093431721697280
  • noteId - 1674093431721697280
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 367BD4DB83A55ECA1419FC2DAAB1A23E62C224359DF53A79B127C8AFF057E5C5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687969951932
  • tweetId - 1674039297006088192
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweet claims that the multiple VIC for one voter is evidence of fraud when there is zero proof that this led to someone voting more than once. ID that proves address is required to vote. “NOTE: The Voter Information Card cannot be used as Identification” https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/9710-Acceptable-Identification-2018.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-28 16:32:31 UTC
(1687969951932)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-29 02:10:57 UTC
(1688004657067)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-28 14:45:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 13:25:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 13:20:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 12:29:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 12:19:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 11:58:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 11:56:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 11:01:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 09:37:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 09:32:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 09:31:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 09:20:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 08:51:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 08:39:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 08:23:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 08:08:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 07:43:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 07:29:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 07:19:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 05:58:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 05:39:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 04:39:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 04:33:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 04:08:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 03:49:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-29 01:03:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 20:36:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 20:31:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-30 11:41:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-03 07:52:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-05 09:40:15 -0500 Rating Details