Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-27 15:19:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CC870AC81DC0BD47D005469858C9FC5C5905303AF08967755723187B9506EFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The plaintiffs in the three rulings cited were gay and lesbian. Contrary to the claim in the Tweet, none of the plaintiffs were transgendered or intersex. https://www.nyclu.org/en/cases/united-states-v-windsor-challenging-federal-defense-marriage-act https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/14-556 https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/hollingsworth-v-perry/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1673574340141662210
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CC870AC81DC0BD47D005469858C9FC5C5905303AF08967755723187B9506EFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1687879142510
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16735743401416622100CC870AC81DC0BD47D005469858C9FC5C5905303AF08967755723187B9506EFB