Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-27 06:09:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The plaintiffs in the three rulings cited were gay and lesbian. Contrary to the claim in the Tweet, none of the plaintiffs were transgendered or intersex. https://www.nyclu.org/en/cases/united-states-v-windsor-challenging-federal-defense-marriage-act https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/14-556 https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/hollingsworth-v-perry/

Written by 9DF7A0D48C2B6D8BCB59FDD69898E16D4C078C00ADB25F2460B525DC1897B565
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1673497604519239690

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1673574340141662210
  • noteId - 1673574340141662210
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9DF7A0D48C2B6D8BCB59FDD69898E16D4C078C00ADB25F2460B525DC1897B565 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687846190849
  • tweetId - 1673497604519239690
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The plaintiffs in the three rulings cited were gay and lesbian. Contrary to the claim in the Tweet, none of the plaintiffs were transgendered or intersex. https://www.nyclu.org/en/cases/united-states-v-windsor-challenging-federal-defense-marriage-act https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/14-556 https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/hollingsworth-v-perry/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-27 06:09:50 UTC
(1687846190849)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-28 02:10:31 UTC
(1687918231836)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-27 17:56:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 16:41:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 12:11:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 10:19:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 09:44:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 09:31:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 09:11:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 09:10:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 09:02:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 08:33:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 08:18:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 07:33:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 06:49:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 06:44:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 06:42:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 06:27:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 06:26:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 06:12:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 06:07:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 05:32:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 05:18:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 03:27:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 03:14:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 02:33:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 02:06:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 02:02:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 01:42:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 01:39:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 01:33:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 01:27:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 01:20:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 01:12:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 06:27:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 05:48:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-27 22:23:59 -0500 Rating Details