Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-20 12:43:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58866B1E0BD164B2CA7D081A0B50CEE6DBFBAA5B1DE63ECA66B9123E31370387
Participant Details

Original Note:

Original tweet asks a rhetorical question, NNN The current proposed note claims "97% of scientists" while the NASA link shared states "97% of *actively publishing* climate scientists", which is a subset of "all scientists" Also, "Publication Bias" is a thing that occurs https://www.jstor.org/stable/44397199

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671135252092186626
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58866B1E0BD164B2CA7D081A0B50CEE6DBFBAA5B1DE63ECA66B9123E31370387
  • createdAtMillis - 1687264999790
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167113525209218662658866B1E0BD164B2CA7D081A0B50CEE6DBFBAA5B1DE63ECA66B9123E31370387