Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-20 12:37:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Original tweet asks a rhetorical question, NNN The current proposed note claims "97% of scientists" while the NASA link shared states "97% of *actively publishing* climate scientists", which is a subset of "all scientists" Also, "Publication Bias" is a thing that occurs https://www.jstor.org/stable/44397199

Written by 785925B089F16F678F43B5E635008EEF8EF0B02445B35CAC2D88CB59C20EA725
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1670353374284517377

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1671135252092186626
  • noteId - 1671135252092186626
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 785925B089F16F678F43B5E635008EEF8EF0B02445B35CAC2D88CB59C20EA725 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1687264666947
  • tweetId - 1670353374284517377
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Original tweet asks a rhetorical question, NNN The current proposed note claims "97% of scientists" while the NASA link shared states "97% of *actively publishing* climate scientists", which is a subset of "all scientists" Also, "Publication Bias" is a thing that occurs https://www.jstor.org/stable/44397199

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-20 12:37:46 UTC
(1687264666947)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-21 02:12:43 UTC
(1687313563423)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-20 09:52:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-20 09:34:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-20 09:26:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-20 08:25:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-20 08:01:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-20 07:43:19 -0500 Rating Details