Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-20 14:26:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Original tweet asks a rhetorical question, NNN The current proposed note claims "97% of scientists" while the NASA link shared states "97% of *actively publishing* climate scientists", which is a subset of "all scientists" Also, "Publication Bias" is a thing that occurs https://www.jstor.org/stable/44397199

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1671135252092186626
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B
  • createdAtMillis - 1687271181994
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16711352520921866263081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B