Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-20 13:50:35 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C65B9853E1896E3AEA79118DD5BC591E08C4A9986756D25148AB1BBF6D4C7944
Participant Details

Original Note:

🔸Apesar da Betano conter uma nota baixa e ser considerada “ruim”. Diferente da Blaze, a empresa responde 99,8% dos seus usuários. E desses usuários+38% voltariam a fazer negócio com a empresa e seu índice de resolução ultrapassam os 46% segundo o próprio reclame aqui. Fonte: https://www.reclameaqui.com.br/empresa/betano/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1670656077120020481
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C65B9853E1896E3AEA79118DD5BC591E08C4A9986756D25148AB1BBF6D4C7944
  • createdAtMillis - 1687269035074
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1670656077120020481C65B9853E1896E3AEA79118DD5BC591E08C4A9986756D25148AB1BBF6D4C7944