Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-18 21:28:24 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40938EDF6D954FB707B9C55C4EAFD40AAFECA7663206AA71D41C9635CF122983
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet gives the wrong idea that the Carbon Footprint is a standardized and well defined value. While being available some standards, the Carbon Footprint is not a widely usable measure, its calculation being heavily related to the context and the method used. https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/9/3/237/812115?login=false https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1670535786859573248
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40938EDF6D954FB707B9C55C4EAFD40AAFECA7663206AA71D41C9635CF122983
  • createdAtMillis - 1687123704005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167053578685957324840938EDF6D954FB707B9C55C4EAFD40AAFECA7663206AA71D41C9635CF122983