Birdwatch Note
2023-06-18 20:55:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The tweet gives the wrong idea that the Carbon Footprint is a standardized and well defined value. While being available some standards, the Carbon Footprint is not a widely usable measure, its calculation being heavily related to the context and the method used. https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/9/3/237/812115?login=false https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y
Written by E5D878D170D7544B1829322678BEC5C258BA88586D0260D6A9D471DA28C2779A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1667705710904475648
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1670535786859573248
- noteId - 1670535786859573248
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E5D878D170D7544B1829322678BEC5C258BA88586D0260D6A9D471DA28C2779A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1687121743296
- tweetId - 1667705710904475648
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The tweet gives the wrong idea that the Carbon Footprint is a standardized and well defined value. While being available some standards, the Carbon Footprint is not a widely usable measure, its calculation being heavily related to the context and the method used. https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/9/3/237/812115?login=false https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-18 20:55:43 UTC (1687121743296) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC (1687140603698) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-18 18:12:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 17:00:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 16:28:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 16:16:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 16:06:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-18 22:58:16 -0500 | Rating Details |