Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-16 07:26:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4C3EC989AB12CE380BF48360631F94798614D2BFD04861248D3D3F62C1BFCF8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Per the journal's own webpage, the study was retracted because it did not obtain consent to participate in a scholarly article from the people surveyed/studied. No "corruption" was involved; informed consent is a basic, keystone component of modern scientific studies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1 https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/informed-consent-research https://www.reviveresearch.org/blog/importance-of-informed-consent-process/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669537769792712704
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4C3EC989AB12CE380BF48360631F94798614D2BFD04861248D3D3F62C1BFCF8
  • createdAtMillis - 1686900394196
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1669537769792712704F4C3EC989AB12CE380BF48360631F94798614D2BFD04861248D3D3F62C1BFCF8