Birdwatch Note
2023-06-16 02:49:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Per the journal's own webpage, the study was retracted because it did not obtain consent to participate in a scholarly article from the people surveyed/studied. No "corruption" was involved; informed consent is a basic, keystone component of modern scientific studies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1 https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/informed-consent-research https://www.reviveresearch.org/blog/importance-of-informed-consent-process/
Written by 41BCAED9AB399AE6C1F23C0563DE8BC3B8022B897846EAFC9784F9DD13428087
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1669386929568088081
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1669537769792712704
- noteId - 1669537769792712704
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 41BCAED9AB399AE6C1F23C0563DE8BC3B8022B897846EAFC9784F9DD13428087 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686883797485
- tweetId - 1669386929568088081
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Per the journal's own webpage, the study was retracted because it did not obtain consent to participate in a scholarly article from the people surveyed/studied. No "corruption" was involved; informed consent is a basic, keystone component of modern scientific studies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1 https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/informed-consent-research https://www.reviveresearch.org/blog/importance-of-informed-consent-process/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-16 02:49:57 UTC (1686883797485) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-19 02:10:03 UTC (1687140603698) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-16 03:41:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 02:26:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 00:48:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-16 00:21:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-15 23:51:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-15 22:56:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-15 22:51:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-15 22:41:47 -0500 | Rating Details |