Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-17 06:28:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 735BF5E9E65F0E2A852D9373A369376665DDD7719F29020544C5472774330B54
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article factually reports the results of this study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2800816 The notes being added are arguments about whether those results are serious or not. Those sort of points should be made in replies, not in community notes. None of the notes above refute the article or original study.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1669417909506981927
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 735BF5E9E65F0E2A852D9373A369376665DDD7719F29020544C5472774330B54
  • createdAtMillis - 1686983294312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1669417909506981927735BF5E9E65F0E2A852D9373A369376665DDD7719F29020544C5472774330B54