Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-15 18:53:40 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The article factually reports the results of this study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2800816 The notes being added are arguments about whether those results are serious or not. Those sort of points should be made in replies, not in community notes. None of the notes above refute the article or original study.

Written by 15447209D11665BBFC0856E0F2632924270E3CA0AC264260A4A4DA33ADE8F745
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1669417909506981927
• noteId - 1669417909506981927
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 15447209D11665BBFC0856E0F2632924270E3CA0AC264260A4A4DA33ADE8F745 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1686855220569
• tweetId - 1669140317713342464
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The article factually reports the results of this study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2800816 The notes being added are arguments about whether those results are serious or not. Those sort of points should be made in replies, not in community notes. None of the notes above refute the article or original study.