Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-14 15:37:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9D37F482CCDBA0424489D4B9C18BD4C2564D3D779BC5B020B6A79B5F44E4637
Participant Details

Original Note:

Additional context, if desired, belong in comments. We do not need CNs to explain purposely vague tweets like this. Comments will suffice for the curious.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1668992127617859595
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9D37F482CCDBA0424489D4B9C18BD4C2564D3D779BC5B020B6A79B5F44E4637
  • createdAtMillis - 1686757064709
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1668992127617859595E9D37F482CCDBA0424489D4B9C18BD4C2564D3D779BC5B020B6A79B5F44E4637