Birdwatch Note
2023-06-14 14:41:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Additional context, if desired, belong in comments. We do not need CNs to explain purposely vague tweets like this. Comments will suffice for the curious.
Written by C77009940C69E312DD807A14CEB2B6DA3B89ED7152C2B9B1B97C4037AEAFEEA1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1668765315197714435
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1668992127617859595
- noteId - 1668992127617859595
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C77009940C69E312DD807A14CEB2B6DA3B89ED7152C2B9B1B97C4037AEAFEEA1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686753706256
- tweetId - 1668765315197714435
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Additional context, if desired, belong in comments. We do not need CNs to explain purposely vague tweets like this. Comments will suffice for the curious.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-14 14:41:46 UTC (1686753706256) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-15 02:12:24 UTC (1686795144909) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-14 15:13:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 11:19:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 11:16:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 10:37:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 10:09:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 09:54:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 09:51:31 -0500 | Rating Details |