Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-07 20:13:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE8B60B04A6398FF78AAF901F6C077796F4E8E3863D597E63C488D9D5FE1714B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet and linked article conflates a notable person's opinion on "fact checking" on Twitter by media/professional writers, and Community Notes contributions by regular Twitter users. The context of the Tweet thread was broken in the article. The full context is here. https://archive.is/2023.06.07-200709/https://twitter.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/1518575316482023424?t=8ibkZkQFZ8efDneaat5fTw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1666538682961068032
participantId -
raterParticipantId - AE8B60B04A6398FF78AAF901F6C077796F4E8E3863D597E63C488D9D5FE1714B
createdAtMillis - 1686168804846
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1666538682961068032AE8B60B04A6398FF78AAF901F6C077796F4E8E3863D597E63C488D9D5FE1714B