Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-07 20:12:39 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This tweet and linked article conflates a notable person's opinion on "fact checking" on Twitter by media/professional writers, and Community Notes contributions by regular Twitter users. The context of the Tweet thread was broken in the article. The full context is here. https://archive.is/2023.06.07-200709/https://twitter.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/1518575316482023424?t=8ibkZkQFZ8efDneaat5fTw&s=19

Written by 3AB3EBC4032AB59B267F4BA919DA4F126A3ED7D584E31AE74171DA018460A2B9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1666461494047809540

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1666538682961068032
  • noteId - 1666538682961068032
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3AB3EBC4032AB59B267F4BA919DA4F126A3ED7D584E31AE74171DA018460A2B9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686168759466
  • tweetId - 1666461494047809540
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This tweet and linked article conflates a notable person's opinion on "fact checking" on Twitter by media/professional writers, and Community Notes contributions by regular Twitter users. The context of the Tweet thread was broken in the article. The full context is here. https://archive.is/2023.06.07-200709/https://twitter.com/ChristinaPushaw/status/1518575316482023424?t=8ibkZkQFZ8efDneaat5fTw&s=19

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-07 20:12:39 UTC
(1686168759466)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-08 02:08:54 UTC
(1686190134085)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-07 16:18:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 15:31:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 15:22:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 15:17:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 15:16:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 15:16:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 15:15:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 15:15:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 15:13:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 11:47:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 19:49:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-15 18:26:46 -0500 Rating Details