Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-04 12:55:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17D48B2F8CB456CBCA7F138C364601AC4C4F62C3A818F0DD109AF73FE1B2C5FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Map is included in tweet to demonstrate what California voting patterns might look like in the absence of election fraud. A salient point for discussions about election integrity. No note needed. Take arguments for or against to the public side. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1665071093588299776
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17D48B2F8CB456CBCA7F138C364601AC4C4F62C3A818F0DD109AF73FE1B2C5FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1685883353778
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166507109358829977617D48B2F8CB456CBCA7F138C364601AC4C4F62C3A818F0DD109AF73FE1B2C5FB