Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-03 19:00:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Map is included in tweet to demonstrate what California voting patterns might look like in the absence of election fraud. A salient point for discussions about election integrity. No note needed. Take arguments for or against to the public side. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

Written by 6CECDC844D3E810783CEE40D22EDA1CBFC57A8A930B14625F059760970F3160D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1664341960482496524

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1665071093588299776
  • noteId - 1665071093588299776
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6CECDC844D3E810783CEE40D22EDA1CBFC57A8A930B14625F059760970F3160D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685818858892
  • tweetId - 1664341960482496524
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Map is included in tweet to demonstrate what California voting patterns might look like in the absence of election fraud. A salient point for discussions about election integrity. No note needed. Take arguments for or against to the public side. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-03 19:00:58 UTC
(1685818858892)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-04 02:42:06 UTC
(1685846526778)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-03 19:20:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 19:04:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 16:15:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 14:52:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 14:43:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 14:42:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 10:09:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 08:17:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 07:55:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 06:25:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 04:27:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 02:30:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 02:15:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 00:10:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 22:24:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 21:50:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 21:21:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 20:11:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 19:35:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 05:44:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 17:07:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-26 01:00:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-26 00:16:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-06 06:00:58 -0500 Rating Details