Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-03 02:29:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A61371C4129292FEDD2AD8D082FD1B86AD28A0DDFCB4DC175AAE9E4FA79B3579
Participant Details

Original Note:

The opinion, an 8-1 decision, did not undermine the right to strike. It simply affirmed and applied existing precedent that says unions cannot destroy property and call it a striking activity, as this union did with the concrete. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1449_d9eh.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664694188603068424
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A61371C4129292FEDD2AD8D082FD1B86AD28A0DDFCB4DC175AAE9E4FA79B3579
  • createdAtMillis - 1685759391500
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1664694188603068424A61371C4129292FEDD2AD8D082FD1B86AD28A0DDFCB4DC175AAE9E4FA79B3579