Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-02 18:03:17 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The opinion, an 8-1 decision, did not undermine the right to strike. It simply affirmed and applied existing precedent that says unions cannot destroy property and call it a striking activity, as this union did with the concrete. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1449_d9eh.pdf

Written by 81B634B07286C7E36910540ADD328EAF594EF7F8F5D0114BC7C10F016C11400C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1664681516868173844

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1664694188603068424
  • noteId - 1664694188603068424
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 81B634B07286C7E36910540ADD328EAF594EF7F8F5D0114BC7C10F016C11400C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685728997743
  • tweetId - 1664681516868173844
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The opinion, an 8-1 decision, did not undermine the right to strike. It simply affirmed and applied existing precedent that says unions cannot destroy property and call it a striking activity, as this union did with the concrete. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1449_d9eh.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-02 18:03:17 UTC
(1685728997743)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-03 02:12:11 UTC
(1685758331005)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-02 19:22:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 18:49:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 18:33:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 17:27:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 17:14:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 15:47:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 14:46:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 13:40:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 13:36:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 13:27:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 13:23:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 11:12:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 10:00:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 05:56:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 05:37:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 22:32:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 21:29:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 20:45:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-02 19:38:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 05:19:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 03:15:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 08:19:21 -0500 Rating Details