Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 21:15:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 788C38659F80E5F3EB0F6CBE0F10428C4FDAD29C4E576AC321E4273E21E404EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Posting links without an explanation is not very helpful. We need to know why the tweet is misleading or needs more context, since the pervious note didn’t add either of those things it’s basically pointless and could be considered harassment or spam

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662839874762711041
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 788C38659F80E5F3EB0F6CBE0F10428C4FDAD29C4E576AC321E4273E21E404EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1685308528089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662839874762711041788C38659F80E5F3EB0F6CBE0F10428C4FDAD29C4E576AC321E4273E21E404EF