Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-28 15:14:54 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Posting links without an explanation is not very helpful. We need to know why the tweet is misleading or needs more context, since the pervious note didn’t add either of those things it’s basically pointless and could be considered harassment or spam

Written by A6BFE78A45FD9EDE77E4989E9C954A7275A576C51301725DE745FD157B5550C2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1662807694686781444

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1662839874762711041
  • noteId - 1662839874762711041
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A6BFE78A45FD9EDE77E4989E9C954A7275A576C51301725DE745FD157B5550C2 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685286894870
  • tweetId - 1662807694686781444
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Posting links without an explanation is not very helpful. We need to know why the tweet is misleading or needs more context, since the pervious note didn’t add either of those things it’s basically pointless and could be considered harassment or spam

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-28 15:14:54 UTC
(1685286894870)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-30 19:13:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 07:27:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 00:58:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 21:48:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 20:07:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 19:19:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 18:01:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 17:10:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:57:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:30:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:21:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:15:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:14:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:13:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:12:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:40:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:38:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:36:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:35:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:28:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:26:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:07:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:57:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:46:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:27:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:27:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:03:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 13:46:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 13:18:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 12:09:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 11:28:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 11:21:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 11:14:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:53:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:50:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:39:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:35:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:27:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:23:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:19:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-31 07:24:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 14:02:14 -0500 Rating Details