Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-26 05:55:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0F22003D157133EE982BC5803B4EB1C2F1D59C8A3D3DD9592EBA459776FF77D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Defamation by implication is a legal claim where a defamed person need not be identified by name. Heard’s statements “could reasonably convey” to a reasonable person that Depp sexually abused Heard. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-ii-v-heard-3-27-2020.pdf A jury determined that Heard defamed Depp with actual malice. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661965643040833541
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0F22003D157133EE982BC5803B4EB1C2F1D59C8A3D3DD9592EBA459776FF77D
  • createdAtMillis - 1685080541139
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1661965643040833541B0F22003D157133EE982BC5803B4EB1C2F1D59C8A3D3DD9592EBA459776FF77D