Birdwatch Note
2023-05-26 05:21:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Defamation by implication is a legal claim where a defamed person need not be identified by name. Heard’s statements “could reasonably convey” to a reasonable person that Depp sexually abused Heard. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-ii-v-heard-3-27-2020.pdf A jury determined that Heard defamed Depp with actual malice. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf
Written by 15384949724401D6E1CAF1358AA57B4C8E1813EDB6BCCF6579096D0B29665D36
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1661145603899023360
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1661965643040833541
- noteId - 1661965643040833541
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 15384949724401D6E1CAF1358AA57B4C8E1813EDB6BCCF6579096D0B29665D36 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1685078461788
- tweetId - 1661145603899023360
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Defamation by implication is a legal claim where a defamed person need not be identified by name. Heard’s statements “could reasonably convey” to a reasonable person that Depp sexually abused Heard. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-ii-v-heard-3-27-2020.pdf A jury determined that Heard defamed Depp with actual malice. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-26 05:21:01 UTC (1685078461788) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-26 01:19:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-26 00:55:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-26 01:56:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-26 01:53:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-26 02:03:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-26 01:23:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-10 04:14:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-03 22:28:36 -0500 | Rating Details |