Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-26 06:19:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D46B3C1AF6380E44D8D5F2487C3BA43945A11268E97A2CCF97D757EF109F181
Participant Details

Original Note:

Defamation by implication is a legal claim where a defamed person need not be identified by name. Heard’s statements “could reasonably convey” to a reasonable person that Depp sexually abused Heard. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-ii-v-heard-3-27-2020.pdf A jury determined that Heard defamed Depp with actual malice. https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661965643040833541
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D46B3C1AF6380E44D8D5F2487C3BA43945A11268E97A2CCF97D757EF109F181
  • createdAtMillis - 1685081985482
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16619656430408335416D46B3C1AF6380E44D8D5F2487C3BA43945A11268E97A2CCF97D757EF109F181