Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-11 04:15:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no “solid evidence” of the SARSCov-2 virus origin : “ Four intelligence agencies and the National Intelligence Council have concluded, that the virus most likely emerged through natural transmission. The C.I.A. has not taken a position and remains undecided” https://www.nytimes.com/article/covid-origin-lab-leak-china.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661756143545249794
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1686456954216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661756143545249794E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9