Birdwatch Note
2023-05-25 15:28:33 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no “solid evidence” of the SARSCov-2 virus origin : “ Four intelligence agencies and the National Intelligence Council have concluded, that the virus most likely emerged through natural transmission. The C.I.A. has not taken a position and remains undecided” https://www.nytimes.com/article/covid-origin-lab-leak-china.html
Written by 71A2AAFE4C9CC63259157EDF2F4B8390401EA29201D1EECE3C138D42FAE659E3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1661752205056016385
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1661756143545249794
- noteId - 1661756143545249794
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 71A2AAFE4C9CC63259157EDF2F4B8390401EA29201D1EECE3C138D42FAE659E3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1685028513215
- tweetId - 1661752205056016385
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no “solid evidence” of the SARSCov-2 virus origin : “ Four intelligence agencies and the National Intelligence Council have concluded, that the virus most likely emerged through natural transmission. The C.I.A. has not taken a position and remains undecided” https://www.nytimes.com/article/covid-origin-lab-leak-china.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-25 15:28:33 UTC (1685028513215) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-25 17:37:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-25 21:47:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-26 07:47:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-26 08:55:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-28 19:55:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-11 00:34:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 23:21:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 23:19:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 23:15:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 22:52:20 -0500 | Rating Details |