Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-11 05:34:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58861E0419FDA531E2D57E3BE67514BD458EF246E870DDB50106B2178C693A27
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no “solid evidence” of the SARSCov-2 virus origin : “ Four intelligence agencies and the National Intelligence Council have concluded, that the virus most likely emerged through natural transmission. The C.I.A. has not taken a position and remains undecided” https://www.nytimes.com/article/covid-origin-lab-leak-china.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661756143545249794
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58861E0419FDA531E2D57E3BE67514BD458EF246E870DDB50106B2178C693A27
  • createdAtMillis - 1686461696989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166175614354524979458861E0419FDA531E2D57E3BE67514BD458EF246E870DDB50106B2178C693A27