Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-10 11:25:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 96259C16C38458FE7A8A6C293A8049357F7D3EC2D0F557E58FD8034ED6400C1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Current note states to include unknowns to prevent bias. However that introduces bias to the denominator. Simply excluding it and using the rest, per the tweet, is using a significant representative sample, and is therefore a better approach. NNN. https://statisticsbyjim.com/basics/representative-sample/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1655529909127618561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 96259C16C38458FE7A8A6C293A8049357F7D3EC2D0F557E58FD8034ED6400C1F
  • createdAtMillis - 1683717955506
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165552990912761856196259C16C38458FE7A8A6C293A8049357F7D3EC2D0F557E58FD8034ED6400C1F