Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-08 11:07:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Current note states to include unknowns to prevent bias. However that introduces bias to the denominator. Simply excluding it and using the rest, per the tweet, is using a significant representative sample, and is therefore a better approach. NNN. https://statisticsbyjim.com/basics/representative-sample/

Written by 6F6CA1A2AB57C87CE9AD20340DC790CD1ECB5FF86707D9703569BEC329F9B875
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1654968316673286145

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1655529909127618561
  • noteId - 1655529909127618561
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6F6CA1A2AB57C87CE9AD20340DC790CD1ECB5FF86707D9703569BEC329F9B875 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1683544063252
  • tweetId - 1654968316673286145
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Current note states to include unknowns to prevent bias. However that introduces bias to the denominator. Simply excluding it and using the rest, per the tweet, is using a significant representative sample, and is therefore a better approach. NNN. https://statisticsbyjim.com/basics/representative-sample/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-08 11:07:43 UTC
(1683544063252)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-09 02:10:50 UTC
(1683598250416)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-08 16:33:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 08:33:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 07:48:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 07:09:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 06:43:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 10:25:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 08:17:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 08:04:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 01:47:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 22:06:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 22:02:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 14:25:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 10:26:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 06:25:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 05:27:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 02:44:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 02:04:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 00:21:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 23:30:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 14:25:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 08:33:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 02:04:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 10:25:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 08:17:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 16:33:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 07:48:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 23:30:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 10:26:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 06:25:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 22:02:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 01:47:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 07:09:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 02:44:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 00:21:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 08:04:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 22:06:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 05:27:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-08 06:43:16 -0500 Rating Details