Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 17:37:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D6AD7ECC8AB381AFDC17CEB16F23E0F52CB4E4A9E0196767E6463A4470FE025B
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed. The claim of "better for the environment" is vague and could be defined in a variety of ways depending on how you count manufacturing, infrastructure, emissions, upkeep, lifespan, etc. The tweet is open to debate which should happen in the replies, not in a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653460164161224714
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D6AD7ECC8AB381AFDC17CEB16F23E0F52CB4E4A9E0196767E6463A4470FE025B
  • createdAtMillis - 1683135460419
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653460164161224714D6AD7ECC8AB381AFDC17CEB16F23E0F52CB4E4A9E0196767E6463A4470FE025B