Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-02 18:03:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

No note needed. The claim of "better for the environment" is vague and could be defined in a variety of ways depending on how you count manufacturing, infrastructure, emissions, upkeep, lifespan, etc. The tweet is open to debate which should happen in the replies, not in a note

Written by 779195FE137E6D470857A6C918EE39AC14D1D889249C207B9C6296FEC8E6BC5B
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1653460164161224714
• noteId - 1653460164161224714
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 779195FE137E6D470857A6C918EE39AC14D1D889249C207B9C6296FEC8E6BC5B Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1683050597598
• tweetId - 1653084007737769985
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 1
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• No note needed. The claim of "better for the environment" is vague and could be defined in a variety of ways depending on how you count manufacturing, infrastructure, emissions, upkeep, lifespan, etc. The tweet is open to debate which should happen in the replies, not in a note