Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-01 14:37:21 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E391233850FCC783AE2BB8F01EFDBF0F0C5A6343526FCE732BE514E54FBF583E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed notes seem to be a protective measure. They speculate the opposite to be true w/same arguments as in tweet. The note w/Harvard is an excellent article, but expresses opposite of the note. Better arguments need done rather than "but I think this." That is best tweeted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652735208825692162
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E391233850FCC783AE2BB8F01EFDBF0F0C5A6343526FCE732BE514E54FBF583E
  • createdAtMillis - 1682951841772
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1652735208825692162E391233850FCC783AE2BB8F01EFDBF0F0C5A6343526FCE732BE514E54FBF583E