Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-30 18:02:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Proposed notes seem to be a protective measure. They speculate the opposite to be true w/same arguments as in tweet. The note w/Harvard is an excellent article, but expresses opposite of the note. Better arguments need done rather than "but I think this." That is best tweeted.

Written by BE32F9E2A4AC559B28F46A5A23309F2C8CC88D12033B171D77E9CAF9B4167EE7
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1652735208825692162
• noteId - 1652735208825692162
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - BE32F9E2A4AC559B28F46A5A23309F2C8CC88D12033B171D77E9CAF9B4167EE7 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1682877754774
• tweetId - 1652687816856313859
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 1
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• Proposed notes seem to be a protective measure. They speculate the opposite to be true w/same arguments as in tweet. The note w/Harvard is an excellent article, but expresses opposite of the note. Better arguments need done rather than "but I think this." That is best tweeted.