Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 04:14:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9921EB871B50E1448AD08B88A1B294CD8C0015DB5B5BAD66F40C731BB234215C
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the 5th circuit decision, the government failed to prove that a restraining order was historically sufficient to deny 2nd amendment rights. Rahimi wasn't convicted of a crime, and therefore not a prohibited person. The prohibition of rights to non felons won in this case. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thebetterwaylaw.com/blog-/the-second-amendment-and-domestic-violence-protective-orders-a-look-at-united-states-v-rahimi%3fformat=amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649935319024664578
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9921EB871B50E1448AD08B88A1B294CD8C0015DB5B5BAD66F40C731BB234215C
  • createdAtMillis - 1682223245121
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16499353190246645789921EB871B50E1448AD08B88A1B294CD8C0015DB5B5BAD66F40C731BB234215C