Birdwatch Note
2023-04-23 00:36:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
In the 5th circuit decision, the government failed to prove that a restraining order was historically sufficient to deny 2nd amendment rights. Rahimi wasn't convicted of a crime, and therefore not a prohibited person. The prohibition of rights to non felons won in this case. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thebetterwaylaw.com/blog-/the-second-amendment-and-domestic-violence-protective-orders-a-look-at-united-states-v-rahimi%3fformat=amp
Written by F4C9EBD6460F3DEC0D7B8B72E7D5348EF1A4AA617ECD4A917C13A2B103D0DB94
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1649874468917878784
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1649935319024664578
- noteId - 1649935319024664578
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4C9EBD6460F3DEC0D7B8B72E7D5348EF1A4AA617ECD4A917C13A2B103D0DB94 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1682210209030
- tweetId - 1649874468917878784
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- In the 5th circuit decision, the government failed to prove that a restraining order was historically sufficient to deny 2nd amendment rights. Rahimi wasn't convicted of a crime, and therefore not a prohibited person. The prohibition of rights to non felons won in this case. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thebetterwaylaw.com/blog-/the-second-amendment-and-domestic-violence-protective-orders-a-look-at-united-states-v-rahimi%3fformat=amp
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-04-23 00:36:49 UTC (1682210209030) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC (1683340944665) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-04-23 04:01:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 00:50:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-22 23:14:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-22 20:22:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-22 22:48:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-22 20:46:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 04:01:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 00:50:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-22 23:14:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-22 20:22:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-22 22:48:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-22 20:46:55 -0500 | Rating Details |