Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-22 19:58:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2642006EB4CE8C7D36E6B3E955B2CC983E182C2D3F12D4E934C8173EA37C08C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Per suggested note's own source, the 2019 study is controversial and seems to suffer from methodological flaws. In addition, an older study does not disprove a new study; it may indicate understanding or evidence has developed since then. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.theguardian.com/food/2019/sep/30/research-red-meat-poses-no-health-risk

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649835400259567619
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2642006EB4CE8C7D36E6B3E955B2CC983E182C2D3F12D4E934C8173EA37C08C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1682193501238
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16498354002595676192642006EB4CE8C7D36E6B3E955B2CC983E182C2D3F12D4E934C8173EA37C08C7