Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-22 17:59:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Per suggested note's own source, the 2019 study is controversial and seems to suffer from methodological flaws. In addition, an older study does not disprove a new study; it may indicate understanding or evidence has developed since then. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.theguardian.com/food/2019/sep/30/research-red-meat-poses-no-health-risk

Written by 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1649835400259567619
• noteId - 1649835400259567619
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1682186386539
• tweetId - 1648038710133288993
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Per suggested note's own source, the 2019 study is controversial and seems to suffer from methodological flaws. In addition, an older study does not disprove a new study; it may indicate understanding or evidence has developed since then. Not misleading, no note needed. https://www.theguardian.com/food/2019/sep/30/research-red-meat-poses-no-health-risk