Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 11:57:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0DA0E1225995F1773D4CDF8D1BD8BB52A242F9478D0896DFDF73F8ED431A17A
Participant Details

Original Note:

OUP is a partner of the Coalition for Diversity & Inclusion in Scholarly Communications (C4DISC) and abides by their Joint Statement of Principles. As such, it would be inappropriate to exclude an essay on the basis of perspective, regardless of whether it is contentious. https://global.oup.com/about/way_we_work/inclusion https://c4disc.org/principles/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1647200023422304257
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C0DA0E1225995F1773D4CDF8D1BD8BB52A242F9478D0896DFDF73F8ED431A17A
createdAtMillis - 1681559820047
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1647200023422304257C0DA0E1225995F1773D4CDF8D1BD8BB52A242F9478D0896DFDF73F8ED431A17A