Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 12:01:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 964C9DBB6FE8DDFE57EC80255AB0CDC02117CB9F5EEC9C05C2AB754957F08E9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

OUP is a partner of the Coalition for Diversity & Inclusion in Scholarly Communications (C4DISC) and abides by their Joint Statement of Principles. As such, it would be inappropriate to exclude an essay on the basis of perspective, regardless of whether it is contentious. https://global.oup.com/about/way_we_work/inclusion https://c4disc.org/principles/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1647200023422304257
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 964C9DBB6FE8DDFE57EC80255AB0CDC02117CB9F5EEC9C05C2AB754957F08E9B
createdAtMillis - 1681560098108
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1647200023422304257964C9DBB6FE8DDFE57EC80255AB0CDC02117CB9F5EEC9C05C2AB754957F08E9B